Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs ATI FirePro V7800
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 26 April 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 307 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800
- 2x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 506
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4894 vs 3372
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.084 vs 8.915
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 vs 146.479
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.448 vs 1.178
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 vs 10.689
- 27.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 vs 6.64
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 vs 506 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4894 vs 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.084 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.448 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 vs 6.64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | ATI FirePro V7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 506 | 2028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3372 | 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 1124.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 1.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 39.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 181.538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 63 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | Cypress |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1009 | 1010 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $759 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 2,154 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1440 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |