AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M275

Intel HD Graphics P4600

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 506
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 491
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 3376
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 8.915
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.463 vs 146.479
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.178
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 10.689
18.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 6.64

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2014 vs 1 June 2013
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115 vs 506
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 491
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231 vs 3376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064 vs 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463 vs 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206 vs 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381 vs 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685 vs 6.64

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 925 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1162
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1717
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1162
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1717

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3342 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3345 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3342 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3345 vs 1717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

506

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

491

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9231

3376

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.064

8.915

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.463

146.479

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.206

1.178

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.381

10.689

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.685

6.64

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3345

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3345

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M275	Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115	506
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	491
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231	3376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064	8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463	146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206	1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381	10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685	6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717	3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717	3345

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M275	Intel HD Graphics P4600
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Venus	Haswell GT2
Launch date	28 January 2014	1 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$799.99
Place in performance rating	993	995
Price now	$699.99
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	3.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	640
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	392 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		84 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Laptop size	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory	0