Intel HD Graphics P530 vs AMD FirePro W2100
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 680 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 26.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1161 vs 859
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4486 vs 3710
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1494
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 12 August 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 680 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1161 vs 859 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4486 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 vs 1494 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 267
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 767
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 767
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1158
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 630 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 vs 267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1161 | 859 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | 315 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4486 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 2329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 2329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 1494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Oland |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 12 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1212 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 435.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | n / a |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P530 with others
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDFirePro W2100
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
