Intel HD Graphics P530 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1160 vs 1125
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 202
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1972
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 21 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1160 vs 1125 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 202 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 vs 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 vs 1972 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8850 vs 4502
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 767
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 767
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1158
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1740 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8850 vs 4502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1160 | 1125 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 | 202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4502 | 8850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 1972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Venus |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1195 | 1196 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |