Intel HD Graphics P530 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1160 vs 1125
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 202
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1972
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1972
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 21 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1160 vs 1125
PassMark - G2D Mark 270 vs 202
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2014 vs 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2014 vs 1972

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • Around 64% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
  • 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
  • Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8850 vs 4502
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 767
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 767
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1158
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1158
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 24
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1740 MB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8850 vs 4502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765 vs 767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765 vs 767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214 vs 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214 vs 1158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1160
1125
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
270
202
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4502
8850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
767
1765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
767
1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1158
3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1158
3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2014
1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2014
1972
Name Intel HD Graphics P530 AMD Radeon R9 M265X
PassMark - G3D Mark 1160 1125
PassMark - G2D Mark 270 202
Geekbench - OpenCL 4502 8850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 767 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 767 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1158 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1158 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2014 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2014 1972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics P530 AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Skylake GT2 Venus
Launch date 1 September 2015 21 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1195 1196
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 625 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,500 million
Compute units 10
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops
Texture fill rate 25 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore