Intel HD Graphics P530 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1159 vs 1133
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 207
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2014 vs 1972
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2014 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 21 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1159 vs 1133 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 vs 207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 vs 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 vs 1972 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8843 vs 4481
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 767
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 767
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1158
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8843 vs 4481 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1159 | 1133 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 207 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4481 | 8843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 1972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P530 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Venus |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1196 | 1197 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P530 with others
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M265X
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M520
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
IntelUHD Graphics
