Intel HD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2158 vs 1667
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2158 vs 1667
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 vs 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 vs 1667 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1555 vs 1204
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 295
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9625 vs 4984
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 979
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 979
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3326 vs 3049
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3326 vs 3049
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1555 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 295 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9625 vs 4984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 vs 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 vs 3049 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | 1555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4984 | 9625 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 979 | 2862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 979 | 2862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 | 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 | 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 3326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1025 | 1027 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P630 with others
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 420
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon E8860
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM
