Intel HD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 265
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 78
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 1211
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2015 vs 23 November 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 462 vs 265
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 vs 78
Geekbench - OpenCL 5315 vs 1211

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 6
  • 6.6x better floating-point performance: 102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 6
Floating-point performance 102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
462
265
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
193
78
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5315
1211
Name Intel HD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 462 265
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 78
Geekbench - OpenCL 5315 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1631

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Broadwell GT1 Kalindi
Launch date 5 January 2015 23 November 2013
Place in performance rating 1366 1369
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 850 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 400 MHz
Floating-point performance 15.6 gflops 102.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 6 128
Texture fill rate 1.3 GTexel / s 3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 1,300 million 1,178 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Memory type System Shared System Shared