Intel HD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 265
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 78
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 1211
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 23 November 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 vs 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 1211 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 6
- 6.6x better floating-point performance: 102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 | 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT1 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 23 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1366 | 1369 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 102.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 6 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |