Intel HD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel HD Graphics

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 266
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 78
4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 1200

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2015 vs 23 November 2013
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	6 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	462 vs 266
PassMark - G2D Mark	193 vs 78
Geekbench - OpenCL	5315 vs 1200

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
21.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 6
6.6x better floating-point performance: 102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops

Core clock speed	400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines	128 vs 6
Floating-point performance	102.4 gflops vs 15.6 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

462

266

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

193

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5315

1200

Name	Intel HD Graphics	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark	462	266
PassMark - G2D Mark	193	78
Geekbench - OpenCL	5315	1200
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1631

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Broadwell GT1	Kalindi
Launch date	5 January 2015	23 November 2013
Place in performance rating	1366	1369
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	850 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	15.6 gflops	102.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	6	128
Texture fill rate	1.3 GTexel / s	3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	6 Watt	25 Watt
Transistor count	1,300 million	1,178 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	System Shared