Intel HD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 464 vs 126
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 30
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 2438
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 2438 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 4.16 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 16 vs 6
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 2438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT1 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 12 October 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1674 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
