Intel HD Graphics 520 vs Intel HD Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 24 vs 6
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 464
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 193
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 470
• 118.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 8

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 3993

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 464
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 193
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 5315
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 8

Compare specifications (specs)