Intel HD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 153

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 15.2x more texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
• 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
• 40.6x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 767 vs 464
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 5315
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 470
• 218.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 8

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	464 767
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	193 153
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5315 6810
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	470 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8 1747

Compare specifications (specs)