Intel HD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 710M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 464 vs 454
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 125
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 2457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 24 July 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 2457 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 96 vs 6
- 19.1x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 470
- 128.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 8
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 vs 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 vs 8 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 2457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 1030 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT1 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 24 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1387 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics with others
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
IntelHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
