NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs Intel HD Graphics
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and Intel HD Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
- 19.1x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 462
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 470
- 168x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 8
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 vs 462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 vs 8 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 128
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 2629
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 2629 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | Intel HD Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 | 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | 5315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 8 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 910M | Intel HD Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Broadwell GT1 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1366 | 1367 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 15.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 6 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,300 million |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |