Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 2023 vs 30 Mar 2022 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
Name | Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29747 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | DG2-128 | AD107 |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 333 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 1140 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 8.218 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 51.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 128.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 168.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |