Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 683.3x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 157.231
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 38.225
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3443 vs 1231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 17 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 vs 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 vs 38.225 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 vs 1231 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.566 vs 1470.844
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 10.937
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 518.554 vs 482.549
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 724
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12748 vs 5115
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 29747
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 vs 1470.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 vs 10.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 vs 482.549 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 724 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12748 vs 5115 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 vs 29747 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | 518.554 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 828 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 12748 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29747 | 41155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 1231 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | DG2-128 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 17 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 333 | 332 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A370M with others
IntelArc A370M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
IntelArc A370M vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
