Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 705 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 388.2x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 66.419
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 1261.593
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 7.89
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 17.882
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 482.549 vs 309.857
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 639
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29725 vs 22732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 705 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 vs 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 vs 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 vs 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 vs 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 vs 309.857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 639 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29725 vs 22732 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 5.6x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1024
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 5115
- 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3443
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 vs 5115 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 3443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | 309.857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 639 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 8905 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29725 | 22732 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 17055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Code name | DG2-128 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 28 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 337 | 340 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A370M with others
IntelArc A370M vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
IntelArc A370M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
IntelArc A370M vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
