Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 705 MHz
• 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 876 MHz
• 388.2x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
• 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 66.419
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 1261.593
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 7.89
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 17.882
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 482.549 vs 309.857
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 639
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29747 vs 22732

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 5.6x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1024
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 5115
• 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	167.171 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1470.844 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.937 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.258 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	482.549 309.857
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 639
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5115 8905
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	29747 22732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3443 17055

Compare specifications (specs)