Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 430

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 4625
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41327 vs 28599

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 430
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4625 6923
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	28599 41327

Compare specifications (specs)