Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1771 MHz
- 462.9x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 193.7x more memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1771 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7216 vs 4301
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52523 vs 36917
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7216 vs 4301 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52523 vs 36917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5277 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4301 | 7216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36917 | 52523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-128 | GP104 |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 283 | 280 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |