Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 745.5x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4294 vs 3949
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4294 vs 3949 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 770 vs 589
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8644 vs 5277
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42508 vs 36917
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 vs 589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8644 vs 5277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42508 vs 36917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A380 | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 770 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5277 | 8644 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4294 | 3949 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36917 | 42508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.883 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 24 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 283 | 286 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |