Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- 1177.1x more texture fill rate: 326.4 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91409 vs 55548
- Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2229 vs 1560
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 27 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91409 vs 55548 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2229 vs 1560 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 744
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 vs 11903
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 744 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 vs 11903 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 744 | 887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11903 | 15578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91409 | 55548 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2229 | 1560 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-512 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 149 | 281 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.89 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.44 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 163.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 326.4 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |