Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 6.8x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 10 nm
- 18.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 10 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 vs 142 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 142 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | DG2-512 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 1698 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | 3.379 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | 1.690 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | 26.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |