Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 647
• Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12415 vs 10465
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 96552 vs 92447
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 449.647
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 4619.617
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 36.308
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 1410.887

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

• Around 43% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3584
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15453 vs 11971
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 140.823

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	683 647
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11971 15453
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	12415 10465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	96552 92447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	528.023 449.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6333.285 4619.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.29 36.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.823 181.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972.437 1410.887

Compare specifications (specs)