Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- 1903.3x more texture fill rate: 614.4 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107205 vs 88540
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 459.949 vs 355.937
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6139.427 vs 4858.771
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 38.046 vs 25.191
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1891.867 vs 1056.078
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2100 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107205 vs 88540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 459.949 vs 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6139.427 vs 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 38.046 vs 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1891.867 vs 1056.078 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 749
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16374 vs 12991
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 vs 77.897
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 749 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16374 vs 12991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 vs 77.897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 847 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12991 | 16374 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13666 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107205 | 88540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 459.949 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6139.427 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 38.046 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.897 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1891.867 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-512 | GP100 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 89 | 92 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2100 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.66 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 307.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |