Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 5325x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10650 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 23 July 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10650 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 739
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19549 vs 11908
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115519 vs 88759
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 739 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19549 vs 11908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 vs 88759 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A770M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 739 | 920 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11908 | 19549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88759 | 115519 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10650 | 2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A770M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
Code name | DG2-512 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 23 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 107 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 33.59 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.79 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 262.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 524.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |