Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)

NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)

Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
3773.6x more texture fill rate: 48.00 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60 Watt

Launch date	4 Jan 2022 vs 29 July 2008
Texture fill rate	48.00 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 60 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz

Core clock speed	530 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)	NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1157
PassMark - G3D Mark		278
PassMark - G2D Mark		38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3297

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)	NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.2	Tesla
Code name	Alder Lake GT1	G94
Launch date	4 Jan 2022	29 July 2008
Place in performance rating	1456	1454
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	640	48
Pixel fill rate	24.00 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	48.00 GTexel/s	12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	60 Watt
CUDA cores		48
Floating-point performance		127.2 gflops
Gigaflops		180
Transistor count		505 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.0
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	System Dependent	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1600 MHz
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
PureVideo HD