Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3773.6x more texture fill rate: 48.00 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1157 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Tesla |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | G94 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1455 | 1452 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 60 Watt |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 180 | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |