Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 142 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 vs 4979
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 2079
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 2079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 2 November 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 142 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 vs 4979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 2079 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 vs 1258
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 378 vs 323
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1237
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3158
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1237
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 vs 1258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 vs 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 | 1479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 378 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 | 4979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 306.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.453 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.651 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 540 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF100 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 2 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1059 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
| Price now | $141.66 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.08 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 256 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 486.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2808 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 540 with others
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 VE
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5470
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
