Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1237 vs 1228
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1705
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1237 vs 1228
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 28 January 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 1705 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 1262
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 319
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 6296
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2308
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2308
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 1262 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 319 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 vs 6296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 vs 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 vs 2308 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1262 | 1700 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6296 | 11041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 | 3265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 | 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 | 3265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 | 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 1705 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | Venus |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 28 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1058 | 1059 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
