Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1237 vs 1228
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1705
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1237 vs 1228
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1705
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 28 January 2014
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1237 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1237 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 1705

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

  • 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 1261
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 319
  • Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 6452
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2308
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2308
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 48
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 64 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1700 vs 1261
PassMark - G2D Mark 362 vs 319
Geekbench - OpenCL 11041 vs 6452
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3265 vs 2308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3265 vs 2308

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1261
1700
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
319
362
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6452
11041
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2308
3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2308
3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1705
Name Intel Iris Graphics 540 AMD Radeon R9 M275X
PassMark - G3D Mark 1261 1700
PassMark - G2D Mark 319 362
Geekbench - OpenCL 6452 11041
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2308 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1237 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2308 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1237 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 1705
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.407

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Graphics 540 AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Skylake GT3e Venus
Launch date 1 September 2015 28 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1065 1066
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,500 million
Compute units 10
Floating-point performance 1,184 gflops
Texture fill rate 37 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore