Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 143 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 8 November 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 143 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 513 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
Core clock speed | 513 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1439 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6954 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | G80 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 8 November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 952 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 143 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 681 million |
Floating-point performance | 228.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 12.31 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 640 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1584 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |