Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 52x more pipelines: 2496 vs 48
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 6954
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2496 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 vs 6954 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1439 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6954 | 15597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | GK110 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 952 | 955 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 2496 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
