Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 720 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 435
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 263
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3157 vs 2332
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3157 vs 2332

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP

• 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1962 vs 1290
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1962 vs 1290

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1432 435
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1290 1962
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1290 1962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3157 2332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3157 2332

Compare specifications (specs)