Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 41 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7028 vs 6869
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 41 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7028 vs 6869 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2225 vs 1435
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 304
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2675
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2675
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1290
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1290
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3157
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2225 vs 1435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1435 | 2225 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 478 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7028 | 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 3329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | GM107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 960 | 961 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | eDRAM | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 550 with others
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
