Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs ATI Radeon 9700 PRO
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and ATI Radeon 9700 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 256x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 128 MB
- 25.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1358 vs 54
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 149
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 July 2002 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 vs 54 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 149 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9700 PRO
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 325 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9700 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | ATI Radeon 9700 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 | 54 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | ATI Radeon 9700 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | R300 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 July 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1136 | 1135 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 325 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 110 million |
Texture fill rate | 2.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | Floppy | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 19.84 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 620 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |