Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R5 M315
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1361 vs 478
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 143
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6597 vs 3573
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 780
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 780
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1361 vs 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 143 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6597 vs 3573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 780 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2761 vs 1514
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2761 vs 1514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2761 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2761 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 M315 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1361 | 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 143 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6597 | 3573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1156 | 1157 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 MX
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
