Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel HD Graphics 6000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

vs

Intel HD Graphics 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1358 vs 875
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 273
• Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6620 vs 3519
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1225
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 1363
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3259
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1225
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 1363
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3259

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000

Compare specifications (specs)