Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1358 versus 875
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 versus 273
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6620 versus 3519
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 versus 1225
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 3259
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 versus 1225
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 versus 1363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 versus 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 versus 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 versus 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3259 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT3e | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1136 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
ATIRadeon 9700 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7000 IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
ATIRadeon 9600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
