Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 und Intel HD Graphics 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1358 vs 875
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 273
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6620 vs 3519
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1225
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 1363
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3259
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1225
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 1363
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3259
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 January 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 vs 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 vs 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3259 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | Broadwell GT3 |
| Startdatum | 3 January 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1136 | 1126 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 48 | 48 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


