Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 382
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 1 October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 vs 382 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10752 vs 6387
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1727
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 1780
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2992
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2792
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10752 vs 6387 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2745 vs 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | 10752 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 382 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 2745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 4175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 814 | 819 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |