Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 382
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 1 October 2012
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 vs 382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

  • 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
  • Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10752 vs 6387
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1727
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 1780
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 1780
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2992
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2992
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2792
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2792
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 960 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10752 vs 6387
PassMark - G3D Mark 2745 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3383 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3383 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4175 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4175 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6387
10752
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
382
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1727
2745
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
4175
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Geekbench - OpenCL 6387 10752
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 382
PassMark - G3D Mark 1727 2745
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 4175
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.895

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) Kepler
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GK104
Launch date 10 July 2019 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 814 819
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 960
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt
CUDA cores 960
Floating-point performance 1,256 gflops
Texture fill rate 48.0 billion / sec
Transistor count 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None