Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and Intel UHD Graphics 617 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 1633
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 1633
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 1633 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1050x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 24.00 GB/s
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 24.00 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 1633 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | Amber Lake GT2 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | |
Place in performance rating | 1224 | 1225 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | 100.8 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | 806.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | 403.2 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 25.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 |