Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- 2x more texture fill rate: 24.00 GB/s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 90 nm
- 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3230
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3230
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3230 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3230 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | G80 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | $1,999 |
Place in performance rating | 1229 | 1225 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch date | 5 March 2007 | |
Price now | $143.51 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.45 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 134 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 681 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |