Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 10.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 65 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 283
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 371

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2013 vs 28 June 2007
Texture fill rate	10.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1191 vs 283
PassMark - G2D Mark	399 vs 371

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
3x more pipelines: 120 vs 40
Around 85% better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3285
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3285

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines	120 vs 40
Floating-point performance	192 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 vs 3285

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1191

283

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

399

371

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3285

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3285

3695

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200	ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark	1191	283
PassMark - G2D Mark	399	371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2095
Geekbench - OpenCL	5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1701
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1701

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200	ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	TeraScale
Code name	Haswell GT3e	RV630
Launch date	27 May 2013	28 June 2007
Place in performance rating	644	646
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	104.0 gflops	192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	40	120
Texture fill rate	10.4 GTexel / s	6.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	392 million	390 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.3	3.3
Memory
Memory type	eDRAM	GDDR4
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		256 MB
Memory bandwidth		35.2 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		2200 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync