Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Radeon 9500
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Radeon 9500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 275 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 1024x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 64 MB
- 54.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 36
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 173 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9500
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | ATI Radeon 9500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | ATI Radeon 9500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | R300 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 993 | 989 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 275 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 110 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 64 MB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 17.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 540 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |