Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1314
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 1206
• 41x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 1.199
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 323.699
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 0.535
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 vs 16.137
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 vs 66.638
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1528
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1528

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 6.7x more pipelines: 480 vs 72
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 361
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1668
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 1206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 66.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3354

Compare specifications (specs)