Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8759 vs 6139
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 24.117
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 335.835
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 1.651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3309
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 vs 1978
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 361
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 25.346
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 67.077
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 2846
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1668
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 2846
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 2145
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 474
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8759 6139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3309

Compare specifications (specs)