Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs ATI Radeon X600 SE
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and ATI Radeon X600 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 42.5x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 36 Watt
- 29.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 49
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 229
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 September 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 36 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 229 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 SE
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 325 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | ATI Radeon X600 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4466 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | ATI Radeon X600 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | RV370 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 789 | 764 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |