Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 188 Watt
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 411
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4462 vs 1853

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
• 33.3x more pipelines: 1600 vs 48
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2219 vs 1471
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 2475
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 2475
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 958
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 958
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2304
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1471 2219
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	566 411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 4541
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 3349

Compare specifications (specs)