Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 188 Watt
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 409
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4460 vs 1853
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 23 September 2009
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 188 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 vs 409
Geekbench - OpenCL 4460 vs 1853

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
  • 33.3x more pipelines: 1600 vs 48
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1471
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 2475
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 2475
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 958
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2304
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 68.0 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1600 vs 48
Floating-point performance 2,720.0 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 vs 1471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4541 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4541 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3671 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3671 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1471
2220
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
566
409
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
4541
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4460
1853
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3349
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 ATI Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark 1471 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 409
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 4541
Geekbench - OpenCL 4460 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1339.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 43.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 245.813
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 ATI Radeon HD 5870

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Broadwell GT3e Cypress
Launch date 5 September 2014 23 September 2009
Place in performance rating 797 798
Type Laptop Desktop
Design ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 850 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 2,720.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 1600
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 188 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,154 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 282 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity