Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 1204
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 21 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 1204 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 306 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 72
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 1204 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Venus |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 610 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |