Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 516
- 9.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10003 vs 1071
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3175 vs 2461
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3175 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 14 May 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 509
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2225 vs 1671
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2225 vs 1671
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 509 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 2461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 615 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |