Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 245 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 12 GB
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 22 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 40x more pipelines: 2880 vs 72
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3281 vs 2231
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 10003
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3281 vs 2231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19542 vs 10003 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 3281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 19542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GK110B |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 662 | 665 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 2880 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 12 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |