Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 13 February 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 vs 2231
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 509
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 vs 2231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 509 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 2269 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 662 | 664 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $260.70 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,216 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
