Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 460
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 509 vs 460

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 72
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2231
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 10003
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 1671
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 1671
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3175
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3175
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 72
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3032 vs 2231
Geekbench - OpenCL 14269 vs 10003
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3667 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3667 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3175
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3175

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2231
3032
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
509
460
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10003
14269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3175
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3175
3340
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 2231 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark 509 460
Geekbench - OpenCL 10003 14269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1671 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1671 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3175 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3175 3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4468

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Skylake GT4e Tobago
Launch date 1 September 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 662 663
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 72 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,080 million
Floating-point performance 1,613 gflops
Texture fill rate 50.4 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 165 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 2 GB
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 104.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync