Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 1857.1x more texture fill rate: 62.40 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.40 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 112 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Raptor Lake GT1 | G92 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1399 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 112 |
| Pixel fill rate | 31.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 62.40 GTexel/s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Raptor Lake 64EU)
