Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 vs 142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 | 1247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 1698 | 654 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | 1.879 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |